So cleaning your logs will finally be a challenge, huh!
| Ferrous Moon http://www.ferrousmoon.com:80/forums/ |
|
| 0.3.0 Discussion Thread http://www.ferrousmoon.com:80/forums/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=2814 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Miah [Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
I made some words about upcoming features I'm working on. The thread will only be peopled by those that actually develop, so here's more or less a "discussion" thread so that you may provide feedback/rage/ego-stroking. |
|
| Author: | Paindood [Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
(Woah I forgot I even had an account here) I started to read and began by thinking "Yeah, I guess he's right that bandwidth serves almost no purpose." Eventually that moved into "This is going to make the game much more difficult." Then I read: Quote: P.S.: Guess what end of the spectrum InterNIC lies?
You're pure evil.
|
|
| Author: | sentinel [Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
So cleaning your logs will finally be a challenge, huh!
|
|
| Author: | bioshacker001 [Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
I myself use the up.link test machine... It's probably unaffected. |
|
| Author: | Miah [Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
Quote: I myself use the up.link test machine... It's probably unaffected.
I love optimists. They're so cute.No, every computer is affected insofar as having a maximum bandwidth. What that maximum is will vary, however. |
|
| Author: | bioshacker001 [Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
As if VSEC 3 wasn't enough -_- |
|
| Author: | marksteele [Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
tbh it sounds like a needed feature....but couldn't you implement it later...like..much later...3.3.0 perhaps? 
|
|
| Author: | bioshacker001 [Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
Hey Miah, are you still planning on implementing the C++ compiler? |
|
| Author: | marksteele [Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
on another note, will there be any way to search through the jumps to find ones that have a greater or equal bandwidth to yours? Seems like it would be a needed feature for late game. |
|
| Author: | Miah [Sun Apr 14, 2013 7:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
Quote: on another note, will there be any way to search through the jumps to find ones that have a greater or equal bandwidth to yours? Seems like it would be a needed feature for late game.
That's more or less the function of the now-not-greyed-out HUD button that's on the lower left.More on that one later, since it's not done. You won't have a pretty map like me, but you will have appropriate tools for line testing. |
|
| Author: | Switch [Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
I'm mostly surprised that it's taken this long for Miah to bring the nerf-bat to the bastion of happiness and anonymity that is internic. It's a much simpler way of inducing rage than lifting servers or the other devices of hell are lined up. |
|
| Author: | sentinel [Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
Well, now ain't that something! The new keymaps interface is looking beautiful, Miah!  I'm glad I helped you to see how important the keymaps are. Nothing beats being able to bypass everything by hitting f5 to f11 with some clicks (connection analysis - bypassers) |
|
| Author: | marksteele [Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
a VERY useful feature for hotkeys would be the ability to cycle forward/backwards through the list of accepted missions (even more-so since you can sort by server). Not sure if its possible but its a pain to open > close > repeat, specially when you have a low trace timer and a batch of missions to do on one server. |
|
| Author: | sentinel [Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
Quote: a VERY useful feature for hotkeys would be the ability to cycle forward/backwards through the list of accepted missions (even more-so since you can sort by server). Not sure if its possible but its a pain to open > close > repeat, specially when you have a low trace timer and a batch of missions to do on one server.
Good idea, I'd like that possibility too. But if you think it's such a pain, maybe you're unaware that right clicking the mission interface takes you back to the main interface? It helps shaving time.
|
|
| Author: | marksteele [Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 0.3.0 Discussion Thread |
Quote: Quote: a VERY useful feature for hotkeys would be the ability to cycle forward/backwards through the list of accepted missions (even more-so since you can sort by server). Not sure if its possible but its a pain to open > close > repeat, specially when you have a low trace timer and a batch of missions to do on one server.
Good idea, I'd like that possibility too. But if you think it's such a pain, maybe you're unaware that right clicking the mission interface takes you back to the main interface? It helps shaving time.. Still a hotkey would help cut down even more (for those 30 second jobs)
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-05:00 |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|