Ferrous Moon
http://www.ferrousmoon.com:80/forums/

"cpuhacker" returns?
http://www.ferrousmoon.com:80/forums/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=1981		 Page 4 of 6
Author:  bioshacker001 [Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
anyone know where i can get a complete list of commands for c++? i still havent given up trying to teach myself, but my friend gave me a list, and when i compiled it and tried to run it, i got: "compatibility error: error executing command line 216" box
Author:  FinalWarrior [Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
"Commands" as in preprocessor directives, C++ keywords, functions/methods in the STL, or what?

Hell, just go to cplusplus.com and look it up.

-- Griffinhart
Author:  eddieringle [Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Quote:
anyone know where i can get a complete list of commands for c++? i still havent given up trying to teach myself, but my friend gave me a list, and when i compiled it and tried to run it, i got: "compatibility error: error executing command line 216" box
http://learncpp.com
Author:  bioshacker001 [Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
thanks. :D and does anyone know where i can get an easier to use compiler than openwatcom? ever since i lost my computer, i"ve been trying to figure out which exe file to open. it comes with, like, 100, and no readme.
Author:  prophile [Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Get a shell account on a linux box and use gcc on that.
Author:  FinalWarrior [Wed Apr 28, 2010 10:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Or get Cygwin, which is what I use for nearly all of my compiling. (The only code I've compiled in MSVS were builds of my team's game - because they're madly in love with Visual Studio's UI and such like. Personally, I prefer Crimson Editor.)

-- Griffinhart
Author:  Tycho [Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Quote:
Or get Cygwin, which is what I use for nearly all of my compiling.
Good gravy, that must hurt.
Author:  bioshacker001 [Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
thnks pplz. i'm unable to learn becuz of all the stupid exe files. y dont they compress it all into like a directory with buttons clearly labling each item? anyways, thx
Author:  FinalWarrior [Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Quote:
Quote:
Or get Cygwin, which is what I use for nearly all of my compiling.
Good gravy, that must hurt.
Not really? I actually really like GCC? (Also I haven't compiled anything except class assignments, and since the teacher for my CS170 class explicitly told us to grab Cygwin/GCC and compile our homeworks with it (as well as Borland and MS's command line compiler), it's not that hard?)

--Griffinhart
Author:  eddieringle [Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Or get Cygwin, which is what I use for nearly all of my compiling.
Good gravy, that must hurt.
Not really? I actually really like GCC? (Also I haven't compiled anything except class assignments, and since the teacher for my CS170 class explicitly told us to grab Cygwin/GCC and compile our homeworks with it (as well as Borland and MS's command line compiler), it's not that hard?)

--Griffinhart
I think he's referring to the fact that you're using cygwin.
Author:  FinalWarrior [Fri Apr 30, 2010 12:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Oh, that? Yeah, that's annoying as fuck all, especially when it turned out that Cygwin's version of Doxygen is/was helluva out-of-date. Messed up several of my assignments.

-- Griffinhart
Author:  Rickton [Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Quote:
thnks pplz. i'm unable to learn becuz of all the stupid exe files. y dont they compress it all into like a directory with buttons clearly labling each item? anyways, thx
Sounds like what you need is Microsoft BOB!

Image
Author:  Tycho [Sat May 01, 2010 7:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Quote:
Oh, that? Yeah, that's annoying as fuck all, especially when it turned out that Cygwin's version of Doxygen is/was helluva out-of-date. Messed up several of my assignments.

-- Griffinhart
Yes, I was referring to Cygwin. GCC is alright. But good lord, Cygwin's fork() emulation incurs such a tremendous performance penalty, even on the simplest things (like autoconf configure scripts). MinGW is better, but not by much.

I find myself using Linux and Mac OS X almost exclusively these days. Windows feels pretty foreign now. When I joined the Onlink project, I was using Windows exclusively, so I've pretty much done a 180 as far as my development environment is concerned.
Author:  eddieringle [Sat May 01, 2010 8:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
Quote:
I find myself using Linux and Mac OS X almost exclusively these days. Windows feels pretty foreign now. When I joined the Onlink project, I was using Windows exclusively, so I've pretty much done a 180 as far as my development environment is concerned.
The more I use Ubuntu, the more software I find that replaces Windows software, like video editing and such. Honestly, I have Windows on my laptop next to me only to test web pages in Internet Explorer.
Author:  bioshacker001 [Tue May 04, 2010 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "cpuhacker" returns?
hey, i've got a friend teaching me c. would that help?
Page 4 of 6 All times are UTC-05:00
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/