Last visit was: It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:16 am


All times are UTC-05:00




Post new topic Reply to topic  [262 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:Re: Onlink Progress (blog?) (Last updated 18 Feb - PM)
PostPosted:Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:45 am 
Literally Nine
User avatar
 

Joined:Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:00 am
Posts:1263
Quote:
It's based off of proprietary works. Although they can make Kite proprietary, they can't do that to Onlink... At least, not without Introversion's permission.
We could probably do something. But we won't anyway.


Top
Offline  
 Post subject:Re: Onlink Progress (blog?) (Last updated 18 Feb - PM)
PostPosted:Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:21 pm 
User avatar
 

Joined:Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts:265
AOL:superactor001
Location:Everywhere and nowhere... But also right behind you and watching you in your sleep >.>
Quote:
Quote:
It's based off of proprietary works. Although they can make Kite proprietary, they can't do that to Onlink... At least, not without Introversion's permission.
We could probably do something. But we won't anyway.
I certainly hope not. Thats half the awesomeness of Onlink.

_________________
access procedure in progress...
...
/root access granted
attempting to input customized user information
upload failure, connection loss
system console session terminated


Top
Offline  
 Post subject:Re: Onlink Progress (blog?) (Last updated 18 Feb - PM)
PostPosted:Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:16 am 
 

Joined:Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:39 am
Posts:1
Hello, guys. Can the irc server posted by bioshacker be accessed from onlink or should i install an irc standalone client?


I'm standing by to see the progress of Onlink, i just found out about Uplink a week ago and it got me completely. I kinda got to the bottom of Uplink and installed Onlink. End of history :)

Ps: i'm new here so i may crack a nut from time to time by accident. Don't take it too seriously.


Top
Offline  
 Post subject:Re: Onlink Progress (blog?) (Last updated 18 Feb - PM)
PostPosted:Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:29 pm 
User avatar
 

Joined:Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts:265
AOL:superactor001
Location:Everywhere and nowhere... But also right behind you and watching you in your sleep >.>
@Exa: Thats a question for the Official IRC Topic. However, i think i can answer it: As far as i know, the Onlink IRC client is just an IRC client. THerefore, you should be able to. However, it's not online ATM, as I have had absolutely NO users request access. I don't know who wants access to it, or even the majority of the usernames on the forums, so i wouldn't be able to just add everyone. Plus, the server is unstable as it is (I'm currently running a single Windows host, until I have the IRC server set up on OpenSUSE.) However, feel free to try. I'll try to finish the setup of the Linux IRC server tonight, and then it'll be on permanently (well, i'll estimate with 94% uptime.)

Edit: Oh, and don't worry about "cracking a nut". Believe me, I've done worse during my time here (I haven't always been the most mature). As long as you don't openly trash people, troll... Etc., there shouldn't be a problem. It seems like theres a certain kind of person this game attracts.

_________________
access procedure in progress...
...
/root access granted
attempting to input customized user information
upload failure, connection loss
system console session terminated


Top
Offline  
 Post subject:Re: Onlink Progress (blog?) (Last updated 18 Feb - PM)
PostPosted:Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:42 am 
 

Joined:Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:15 am
Posts:6
I don't think the images are working


Top
Offline  
 Post subject:Re: Onlink Progress (blog?) (Last updated 18 Feb - PM)
PostPosted:Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:01 am 
 

Joined:Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:16 pm
Posts:190
Quote:
In other news, GCC's inline assembler causes blindness or insanity, depending on which happens first:
Code:
__asm__ __volatile__( "0: \n" "\tmftbu %0 \n" "\tmftb %1 \n" "\tmftbu %2 \n" "\tcmpw %2,%0 \n" "\tbne 0b \n" : "=r"(upper),"=r"(lower),"=r"(tmp));
what the *** is that? is that really the syntax for gcc's inline assembler? its terrible


Top
Offline  
 Post subject:Re: Onlink Progress (blog?) (Last updated 18 Feb - PM)
PostPosted:Sun Mar 29, 2015 10:59 am 
Literally Nine
User avatar
 

Joined:Sat Apr 02, 2005 3:31 pm
Posts:1171
Location:The vicinity of an area adjacent to a location.
Quote:
Quote:
In other news, GCC's inline assembler causes blindness or insanity, depending on which happens first:
Code:
__asm__ __volatile__( "0: \n" "\tmftbu %0 \n" "\tmftb %1 \n" "\tmftbu %2 \n" "\tcmpw %2,%0 \n" "\tbne 0b \n" : "=r"(upper),"=r"(lower),"=r"(tmp));
what the *** is that? is that really the syntax for gcc's inline assembler? its terrible
That's AT&T syntax, and it's also for PowerPC assembler.

_________________
- Tycho

Image


Top
Offline  
Display posts from previous: Sort by 
Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC-05:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Theme created by Miah with assistance from hyprnova