True, but IO-IN does more than that. Okay, so maybe an Onlink section will work. It was just a random suggestion anyway
~ Eleazar
| Ferrous Moon http://www.ferrousmoon.com:80/forums/ |
|
| IO-IN Wiki http://www.ferrousmoon.com:80/forums/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=1028 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Eleazar [Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | IO-IN Wiki |
The wiki is mainly about Onlink, so why don't you move it over to Onlink-mod.net? At least, the Onlink-relevant part. Those parts relevant to IO-IN will obviously need to stay there. ~ Eleazar |
|
| Author: | Miah [Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Because IO.IN is, in essence, the production force for Onlink. |
|
| Author: | Eleazar [Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
True, but IO-IN does more than that. Okay, so maybe an Onlink section will work. It was just a random suggestion anyway ~ Eleazar |
|
| Author: | prophile [Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Like Miah and Steven and I don't already have enough separate installs of things to maintain ^^ |
|
| Author: | Miah [Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Easy. Make the topic like "Software (Onlink)" |
|
| Author: | Eleazar [Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Check my user page: http://www.io-in.com/wiki/User:Eleazar Little hard for me to change all those titles now, because most of them have been cross-referenced. Maybe I'll just leave them as they are for now. The page "Onlink" will eventually become the hub for all the Onlink-related articles. ~ Eleazar |
|
| Author: | ChaosR [Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Or you just make an onlink namespace, like: Onlink:Software |
|
| Author: | Eleazar [Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Would uploading images of the gateways in Onlink (The thumbnails and the large images) constitute copyright infringement? I think it would be nice to have some sort of visual references on the Gateway page. ~ Eleazar |
|
| Author: | ChaosR [Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
no, from wikipedia: Though the picture is subject to copyright, I feel it is covered by the United States fair use laws because: 1. there is no free equivalent; 2. it is being used to identify and illustrate the subject; 3. it is being used on a free website, for educational use only; 4. it does not replace the original market role for the content. |
|
| Author: | Eleazar [Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Legalist  Okay. Thanks. ~ Eleazar |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-05:00 |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|